Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL PAPER
Year : 2011  |  Volume : 2  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 26-29  

Adverse drug reactions of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in orthopedic patients


Department of Pharmacology, Pramukh Swami Medical College, Gokalnagar, Karamsad 388 325, Anand, Gujarat, India

Date of Web Publication25-Feb-2011

Correspondence Address:
Alpa Pragnesh Gor
Department of Pharmacology, Pramukh Swami Medical College, Gokalnagar, Karamsad 388 325, Dist: Anand, Gujarat
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0976-500X.77104

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 

Objectives: To identify the ADRs due to NSAIDs and to know how to monitor the drug's effect. Materials and Methods: A descriptive study was undertaken in the Orthopedic Outpatients Department of a tertiary care teaching hospital. Hundred patients were enrolled in this study to observe the risk of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) due to NSAIDs. All the ADRs were further analyzed in relation to age and sex, type of drug and its pattern. Probability scale was used for the causality assessment of the ADRs. Results: 26% of the 100 patients developed ADR due to NSAIDs. There was not much of a difference in the number of the ADRs in relation to the gender. Diclofenac was the highest prescribed drug (65 patients), followed by paracetamol (12), nimesulide (10), ibuprofen (6), piroxicam (5) and Etoricoxib (2). Diclofenac accounted for the maximum number (73%) of ADRs, followed by nimesulide (16%), paracetamol (7%), and Etoricoxib (4%). Conclusion: Pharmacovigilance improves recognition of ADRs by the medical students. It allows the treating physician to identify the ADR associated with drugs, in particular, with the ones considered relatively safe and with those commonly prescribed by the medical and non-health professionals.

Keywords: Adverse drug reaction, pharmacovigilance, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug


How to cite this article:
Gor AP, Saksena M. Adverse drug reactions of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in orthopedic patients. J Pharmacol Pharmacother 2011;2:26-9

How to cite this URL:
Gor AP, Saksena M. Adverse drug reactions of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in orthopedic patients. J Pharmacol Pharmacother [serial online] 2011 [cited 2019 Oct 22];2:26-9. Available from: http://www.jpharmacol.com/text.asp?2011/2/1/26/77104


   Introduction Top


Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have been used to decrease pain and inflammation for rheumatological and other conditions for decades. They cause side effects including gastrointestinal (GI) disorders (from minor dyspepsia through to major ulcers, bleeding and perforation), kidney effects and cardiovascular effects. NSAIDs are a group of drugs that inhibit both the isoforms of cyclooxygenase enzyme (COX-1 and COX-2). Conventional NSAIDs are nonselective, which bind and inhibit both the isoforms, but cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1) is inhibited more avidly than cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2). [1] Inhibition of COX-1 is responsible for the side effects and that of COX-2 for therapeutic effects. This has resulted in the introduction of the COX-2 selective drugs. [2]

For patients with musculoskeletal disorders, conventional NSAIDs form the mainstay of clinical care. [3]

Some risks of traditional NSAIDs were well documented before the development of selective COX-2 inhibitors. NSAID induced gastric perforations, obstructions and ulcers were blamed for the 16.000 deaths that occurred in the US and 10,000 deaths in Canada in a year. [4]

It has been proposed that COX-2 inhibitors result in anti-inflammatory and analgesic properties, similar to what can be achieved with conventional NSAIDs. However, by sparing COX-1 activity, selective COX-2 inhibitors have greatly reduced toxicity, particularly in GIT. The prevalence of NSAID induced ulcer has been reported to be between 10 and 25% and it causes significant morbidity and mortality. [5]

The pattern of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) caused by NSAIDs in different organ systems is essentially similar. The main distinctions are in the quantitative differences that exist in the occurrence or frequency of ADRs among the different groups, especially those more frequently occurring in the GI tract, liver and, to some extent, kidney. [6],[7],[8],[9],[10],[11],[12] Some drugs do have a propensity to cause rare ADRs, e.g., agranulocytosis and aplastic anaemia with phenylbutazone, [6],[7] and Stevens Johnson and Lyell's Syndromes and other severe skin reactions with isoxicam and piroxicam. [13],[14] The difficulty is to quantify many of the individual reactions, especially when it comes to population studies. [7] Here, the main issue is to establish the exposure of a known population to an individual drug and to know if individual members of population are taking other drugs or have conditions that might contribute to, or be major confounding factors, in the development of ADRs. [6],[7],[13],[15]

In the backdrop of these issues, the study was undertaken to identify the ADRs due to NSAIDS and to know how to monitor the drug's effect.


   Materials and Methods Top


The descriptive study was conducted for monitoring the ADRs in the Orthopedic Outpatients Department of Shree Krishna Hospital and Medical Research Centre, a 550-bedded tertiary care teaching rural hospital attached to Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, after obtaining the approval of the Institutional Ethics Committee. The study period was of 3 months duration, from June 2009 to 31 August 2009. The effective sample size was 97 after assuming incidence rate of ADR, which was 10%. [16] In our study, the sample size was 100 patients.

The concerned specialists of the orthopedic department were informed about the aim of the study, seeking their cooperation and were assured of full confidentiality of the information. A total of 100 patients taking NSAIDs, of either sex, of age 18 years and above were included in the study. The following categories of patients were excluded from the study: patients with history of liver and kidney damage, cardiovascular disease, acid peptic diseases, pregnancy and lactation. All the patients were enrolled after getting their informed and written consent as per the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Demographic data, medical history and diagnosis were noted. Detailed history of ADR (drug name, dose and frequency, date of onset, pattern) was recorded in separate performa. Naranjo probability scale was used for the causality assessment of the ADRs. No follow-up was done. Data were analyzed using Fischer's exact test. A P value <0.05 was consider significant.


   Results Top


Out of 100 patients, 26 had developed ADR. There was not much difference in the number of patients in relation to gender. When the number of males and females was compared, there was no significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.001) [Table 1]. The number of patients who received diclofenac was more in comparison to the number that received other NSAIDs. As the number of prescriptions of diclofenac was more, the percentage of ADR was more [Table 2]. Out of 26 ADRs, 19 (73%) were due to diclofenac, 2 (7%) were due to paracetamol and 4 (15%) were due to nimesulide [Table 2]. Less number of patients received ibuprofen or piroxicam, and therefore, no ADR was found due to these drugs. Out of two patients, one had ADR due to etoricoxib. Nineteen ADRs were found in the age group between 18 and 65 years and seven were in the age group above 65 years, which was found to be statistically significant (P < 0.001) [Table 3]. When the two groups were compared in relation to gender and occurrence of ADR, it was found to be statistically insignificant [Table 4]. This implies that gender has no effect on the occurrence of ADRs due to NSAIDs. Out of 26 ADRs, 9 were "Probable," 12 were "Possible" and 5 were "Doubtful' in nature after causality assessment.
Table 1: Age and sex of the patients

Click here to view
Table 2: Drug utilization and adverse drug reaction

Click here to view
Table 3: Age of patients and adverse drug reactions

Click here to view
Table 4: Sex of patients and adverse drug reactions

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


On the basis of the present study, it was found that the prevalence rate of ADR was 26%. A study conducted in Mumbai showed that the incidence rate of various kinds ADRs of NSAIDs was ranging from 28 to 33%. [17] The specific risk factors for NSAID ADR are older age, a history of gastro-duodenal ulcer, dyspepsia, concomitant use of medications such as corticosteroids and anticoagulants, high dosage use of multiple NSAIDs and the presence of other chronic co-morbidities. [18] In our study, only 11 patients were above 65 years of age, who received NSAIDS. Among these 11 patients, 7 (64%) developed ADR. Although one of these risk factors (i.e., age) was statistically significant, further clinical review is required to see if they are applicable to clinical practice. Risk factor models for NSAIDs associated with gastropathy were constructed. [19] These models should be helpful to clinicians in predicting possible GI toxicity when they prescribe NSAIDs. These results prompt us to hypothesize that if more source materials are available and more risk factors are identified, we can establish models to predict the overall occurrences of ADRs induced by NSAIDs, which could be more valuable to clinical practice. We have not evaluated other risk factors. In the present study, it was found that diclofenac, paracetamol, nimesulide, ibuprofen, etorocoxib and piroxicam were the top six orally taken NSAIDs. Diclofenac was the most prescribed drug. One review article suggested that an agent with comparatively less GI side effects, like ibuprofen and diclofenac, should be preferred for indomethacin, piroxicam or naproxen, which are more gastro toxic. [1] In our study, out of 65 patients, 19 developed ADRs due to diclofenac. Out of these 19 patients, 14 had GIT related symptoms (i.e., nausea, abdominal distress, gastritis, vomiting, etc.). Three patients had skin-related symptoms (i.e., urticaria, itching and redness of skin) and two patients developed non-specific symptoms (i.e., burning in body parts and general weakness). No ADR was found in all six patients who received ibuprofen. A review suggests that in situations like osteoarthritis where inflammation of joint is minimal, analgesics like paracetamol should be preferred over anti-inflammatory drugs like ibuprofen. [20] In our study, 12 patients received paracetamol. Out of these, two developed ADR (i.e., decreased appetite and abdominal distress in each). All osteoarthritis patients received paracetamol. Since the number of patients who received diclofenac was more in comparison to the number that received other NSAIDs, the number of ADRs was more with diclofenac. Studies have reported that though 20% of patients on long-term treatment with diclofenac experience side effects, only 2% have to discontinue the drug, mostly due to GI complaints. [21] Nimesulide is the second drug causing the highest ADRs, as it accounts for the same in 4 out of 10 patients. The symptoms of ADR due to nimesulide were nausea, decreased appetite, vertigo and general weakness, which suggested no concluding remark. Though nimesulide is a preferential COX-2 inhibitor, and therefore assumed to be safer in clinical use, its GI tolerance has not been proven to be superior to other NSAIDs because various epidemiological studies give little importance to the hypothesis that selective inhibition of COX-2 may have a sparing effect on the GIT. [22] In our study, Etoricoxib was not adequate to draw any conclusions because of the very low number of prescriptions (only two patients). As such, Etoricoxib does not have direct topical effect on the GI mucosa, which confers less risk of the clinical manifestation of GI toxicity typically seen with nonselective NSAIDs, supporting the concept that sparing the COX-1 results in a lack of interference with platelet functions and gastroprotective mechanisms. [23] Several publications indicate that the female gender experiences a higher incidence of ADRs than does the male gender. [24] In our study, there was not much difference in the number of ADRs in male and female patients. Although the study was conducted on limited number of patients and in a short period of time without follow-up, we could not conclude anything regarding relation of gender and ADR.


   Conclusion Top


Monitoring of ADRs is an ongoing, ceaseless, and continuing process. Though pharmacovigilance is still in its infancy in India, this is likely to expand in the times to come. This is because as the newer and newer drugs hit the market, the need for pharmacovigilance grows more than ever before. Pharmacovigilance is an important tool for the treating physician to develop safe medical practice. Identifying the adverse drug events, recording them meticulously and reporting them to the concerned authority is a valuable task in medical profession. This practice will prove to be very valuable in making the drug therapy safer and rational. This study has paved the way to carry out further studies on a large population in the future.


   Acknowledgments Top


We would like to acknowledge the Dean of Pramukhswami Medical College, Dr Utpala Kharod, and Head of the Orthopedic Department, Dr Mihir Dholkia, and his team, for their constant cooperation. We would like to acknowledge the ICMR STS editorial team for considering the study (sanction no-21/GU/PMC-7/09-BMS). Lastly, we would like to thank all the patients who agreed to participate in the study. Without them, the study would not have been possible.

 
   References Top

1.Dhikav V, Singh S, Anand KS. Newer non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: A review of their therapeutic potential and adverse drug reactions. J Indian Acad Commun Med 2002;3:332-8.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.Lipsy P. The role of cyclooxygenase-2-specific inhibitors in clinical practice. Am J Med 2001;110:1-5.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.Pincus T, Swearingen C, Cummine P, Callahaw LP. Preference for non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs versus acetaminophen and concomitant use of both types of drugs in patients with osteoarthritis. J Rheumatol 2000;27:1020-7.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.Singh G, Ramey DR, Morfeld D, Shi H, Hatoum HT, Fries JF. Gastrointestinal tract complications of Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug treatment in rheumatoid arthritis: A prospective observational cohort study. Arch Intern Med 1996;156;1530-6.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.Shah AA, Thjodleifsson B, Murray FE, Kay E, Barry M, Sigthorsson G, et al. Selective inhibition of Cox-2 in humans is associated with less gastrointestinal injury: A comparision of nimesulide and naproxen. Gut 2001;48:339-46.   Back to cited text no. 5
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
6.Rainsford KD, Veto GP. Side-effects of anti-Inflammatory drugs: Clinical and Epidemiological Agents. 1983.   Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.Rainsford KD, Veto GP. Side-effects of anti-Inflammatory drugs: Clinical and Epidemiological Agents. 1987.   Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.Rainsford KD, Veto GP. Side-effects of anti-inflammatory drugs. 3rd ed. Ktuwer Academic Publishers; 1992.   Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.Rainsford KD. Profile and mechanisms of gastrointestinal and other side-effects from NSAIDs. Am J Med 1999;107:27-36.   Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.Simon RA, Namazy J. Adverse reactions to aspirin and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Clin Rev Allergy Immunol 2003;24:239-52.   Back to cited text no. 10
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
11.Day R. COX-2: Where are we in 2003? Distinction from NSAIDs becoming blurred. Arthritis Res Ther 2003;5:116-9.   Back to cited text no. 11
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
12.Sanchez-Borges M, Capriles-Hulett A, Caballero-Fonseca F. Cutaneous reactions to aspirin and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol 2003;24:125-36.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.Rainsford KD. Mechanisms of rash formation and related skin conditions induced by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1992. p. 287-301.   Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.Sturkenboom M, Nicolosi A, Cantarutti L, Mannino S, Picelli G, Scamarcia A, et al. Incidence of mucocutaneous reactions in children treated with niflumic acid, other nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, or nonopioid analgesics. Pediatrics 2005;116:26-33.   Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.Rainsford KD. Relationship of nimesulide safety to its pharmacokinetics: Assessment of adverse Reactions. Rheumatology 1999;38:4-10.  Back to cited text no. 15
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
16.Tubert P, Bégaud B, Péré JC, Haramburu F, Lellouch J. Power and weakness of spontaneous reporting: A probabilistic approach. J Clin Epidemiol 1992;45:283-6.   Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.Shahani S, Nerlekar S. Adverse drug reactions in dermatology and a growing need for pharmacovigilance. J Pharmacovig Drug Saf 2009;6:35-7.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.Fry RB, Ray MN, Cobangn DJ, Weissman NW. Racial / ethnic disparities in patient - reported non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAIDs) risk awareness, patient - doctor NSAID risk communication and NSAID risk behavior. Arthritis 2007;57:1539-45.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.Shi W, Wang YM, Li SL, Yan M, Li D, Chen BY, et al. Risk factor of adverse drug reaction from non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in shanghi patients with arthropathy. Acta Pharmacol Sin 2004;25:357-65.  Back to cited text no. 19
[PUBMED]    
20.Miceli-Richard C, Le Bars M, Schmidely N, Dougados M. Paracetamol in osteoarthritis of the knee. Ann Rheum Dis 2004;63:923-30.  Back to cited text no. 20
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
21.Boelsterli UA. Diclofenac induced liver injury: A paradigm of idiosyncratic drug toxicity. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2003;192:307-22.  Back to cited text no. 21
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
22.Sulleyman H, Cardirci E, Albayrak A, Hallici Z. Nimesulide is a selective cox-2 inhibitory, atypical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug. Curr Med Chem 2008;15:278-83.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.Hunt RH. Gastrointestinal safety profile of etoricoxib. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2003;17:201-10.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.Zopf Y, Rabe C, Neubert A, Gassmann KG, Rascher W, Hahn EG, et al. Women encounter ADRs more than do men. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2008;64:999-1004.  Back to cited text no. 24
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]


This article has been cited by
1 Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Phase III Trial of Duloxetine Monotherapy in Japanese Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain
Shinichi Konno,Natsuko Oda,Toshimitsu Ochiai,Levent Alev
SPINE. 2016; 41(22): 1709
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Enhanced Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Nanoencapsulated Diclofenac
J.Z. Goh,S.N. Tang,A. Zuraini,Z.A. Zakaria,A.A. Kadir,H.S. Chiong,M.S.O. Fauzee,M.N. Hakim
European Journal of Inflammation. 2013; 11(3): 855
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
3 Days lost due to disability of diclofenac-induced adverse drug reactions [Días perdidos debido a discapacidad por reacciones adversas inducidas por diclofenac]
Thomas, D. and Mathew, M. and Raghavan, C.V. and Mohanta, G.P. and Reddy, Y.P.
Pharmacy Practice. 2012; 10(1): 40-44
[Pubmed]
4 ADR monitoring of NSAIDs among the in- patients of the orthopaedic ward in a tertiary care centre: A prospective observational study
Venkatachalam, S. and Bhat, R.
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 2012; 6(1): 42-46
[Pubmed]
5 Adverse drug reactions of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
Wiwanitkit, V.
Journal of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapeutics. 2011; 2(2): 132
[Pubmed]



 

Top
  
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
    Introduction
    Materials and Me...
    Results
    Discussion
    Conclusion
    Acknowledgments
    References
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed3172    
    Printed195    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded901    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 5    

Recommend this journal