Table of Contents  
RESEARCH LETTER
Year : 2011  |  Volume : 2  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 192-194  

Drug promotional literature distributed by pharmaceutical companies: Do they provide enough information to ascertain their validity?


1 Department of Pharmacology, Govt. Medical College, Surat, India
2 Department of Community Medicine, Govt. Medical College, Surat, India

Date of Web Publication29-Jul-2011

Correspondence Address:
Jaykaran
Department of Pharmacology, Govt. Medical College, Surat
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0976-500X.83288

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Jaykaran, Saxena D, Yadav P, Kantharia N D. Drug promotional literature distributed by pharmaceutical companies: Do they provide enough information to ascertain their validity?. J Pharmacol Pharmacother 2011;2:192-4

How to cite this URL:
Jaykaran, Saxena D, Yadav P, Kantharia N D. Drug promotional literature distributed by pharmaceutical companies: Do they provide enough information to ascertain their validity?. J Pharmacol Pharmacother [serial online] 2011 [cited 2019 Nov 18];2:192-4. Available from: http://www.jpharmacol.com/text.asp?2011/2/3/192/83288

Sir,

A physician's quench for acquiring information on any new drug ranges from published manuscripts in peer-reviewed journals to Continuous Medical Education programs, from drug representatives, from pharmaceutical company's files, from drug monographs, to drug promotional literature received by them. Very often, due to time constraints and busy schedules, the literature promoting the drugs and distributed by the drug company representative is an important source of seeking information. [1] Most of the drug promotional literature aims at raising the awareness about the drug but few attempts to influence the physician by presenting relevant research findings. [1] It is very important that promotional literature presenting the research findings should provide all information so that the validity of the literature can be ascertained by the physicians. For a better understanding and potential utilization of new drugs on patients, it is very important for a physician to critically analyze research findings and draw conclusions as misleading and wrong information is not uncommon in the literature used for drug promotion. [2],[3] The present study aims to critically analyze quality reporting of various parameters utilized in drug promotional literature distributed by pharmaceutical companies to physicians. This effort may help the physicians in checking the validity of quantitative research.

Efforts were made over a month to collect drug promotional literature from the outpatient department of a tertiary care hospital attached to the Government Medical College in Surat (India). The drug promotional literature was sorted out and was analyzed by a team of trained researchers. A pretested and pre-validated checklist was used for analysis of promotional information. This checklist included the basic parameters needed to analyze quantitative research [Table 1]. Only printed drug promotional literature was analyzed, the accompanying monograph was not taken into account. All values are shown as frequencies, percentages and 95% Confidence Interval around percentages.
Table 1: Analysis of various parameters in drug promotional literature distributed by pharmaceutical companies (n = 825)

Click here to view


Out of 825 samples of drug promotional material, the quantitative research findings were mentioned in only 74 (8.9%, 95% CI 7.2% to 11.1%). The method of adjustment for drop-out was mentioned in four (5.4%), the confidence interval in three (4%) and the power of the study in five (6.7%). Other results are shown in [Table 1].

The findings from the present study show that the quality of reporting of various parameters of quantitative research in drug promotional literature distributed by pharmaceutical companies is poor. On the basis of the information available in the promotional literature, it is very difficult for a physician to assess the validity of the study and that may lead to inappropriate prescribing. A study by Cardarelli et al., also made similar observations. [4] A physician should be made aware of the consequences of the decision taken for prescribing drugs based on the research findings mentioned in promotional literature since inadequate information is provided by them. We strongly recommend a legal provision to establish a code of conduct or censoring of inappropriate citations of information in drug promotional literature.


   Acknowledgments Top


I would like to acknowledge Dr. Abhinav Sharma and Dr. Paresh Solanki both first-year residents, Department of Pharmacology, Govt. Medical College, Surat for collection of drug promotional materials from various outpatient departments of the New Civil Hospital, Surat.

 
   References Top

1.Prosser H, Almond S, Walley T. Influences on GPs' decision to prescribe new drugs - the importance of who says what. Fam Pract 2003;20:61-8.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.Mansfield PR, Henry D. Misleading drug promotion--no sign of improvements. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2004;13:797-9.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.Islam MS, Farah SS. Misleading promotion of drugs in Bangladesh: Evidence from drug promotional brochures distributed to general practitioners by the pharmaceutical companies. J Public Health (Oxf) 2007;29:212-3.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.Cardarelli R, Licciardone JC, Taylor LJ. A cross-sectional evidence-based review of pharmaceutical promotional marketing brochures and their underlying studies: Is what they tell us important and true? BMC Fam Pract 2006;7:13.  Back to cited text no. 4
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]



 

Top
  
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
   Acknowledgments
    References
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1820    
    Printed103    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded354    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal