|Year : 2013 | Volume
| Issue : 5 | Page : 38-42
Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor drugs safety and efficacy in ophthalmic diseases
Pasquale Ventrice1, Christian Leporini1, Jose' Francisco Aloe2, Ettore Greco3, Giacomo Leuzzi1, Giuseppina Marrazzo1, Giovanni Battista Scorcia4, Donatella Bruzzichesi4, Varano Nicola4, Vincenzo Scorcia4
1 Department of Science of Health, School of Medicine; Department of Science of Health, Pharmacovigilance's Centre Calabria Region, University Hospital Mater Domini, Catanzaro, Italy
2 Department of Pharmacy Unit, Giovanni Paolo II Hospital, Lamezia Terme, Italy
3 Department of Oncology Unit, Giovanni Paolo II Hospital, Lamezia Terme, Italy
4 Department of Ophthalmology, University of "Magna Graecia", Catanzaro, Italy
|Date of Web Publication||2-Nov-2013|
Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, University of Catanzaro, Viale Europa-Germaneto, 88100 Catanzaro
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
| Abstract|| |
Macular degeneration is the leading cause of blindness in developed countries. In the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) has emerged as a key target for therapy. The intravitreal injection of anti-VEGF drugs has been widely employed to reduce the disease progression and improve the visual outcomes of the affected patients. However, each intravitreal inoculation poses a risk of several complications as infection, inflammation, endophthalmitis, intraocular inflammation, increase of intraocular pressure and vitreous hemorrhage. This short review evaluates the efficacy and the incidence of adverse drug reactions related to intravitreal administration of the main anti-VEGF drugs actually available: Bevacizumab, ranibizumab and aflibercept.
Keywords: Adverse drug reactions, aflibercept, age-related macular degeneration, bevacizumab, choroidal neovascularization, ranibizumab
|How to cite this article:|
Ventrice P, Leporini C, Aloe J, Greco E, Leuzzi G, Marrazzo G, Scorcia GB, Bruzzichesi D, Nicola V, Scorcia V. Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor drugs safety and efficacy in ophthalmic diseases. J Pharmacol Pharmacother 2013;4, Suppl S1:38-42
|How to cite this URL:|
Ventrice P, Leporini C, Aloe J, Greco E, Leuzzi G, Marrazzo G, Scorcia GB, Bruzzichesi D, Nicola V, Scorcia V. Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor drugs safety and efficacy in ophthalmic diseases. J Pharmacol Pharmacother [serial online] 2013 [cited 2020 May 29];4, Suppl S1:38-42. Available from: http://www.jpharmacol.com/text.asp?2013/4/5/38/120947
| Introduction|| |
Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the leading cause of blindness in the population older than 50 years and consists of an alteration in the central part of the retina, the macula.  Two different forms of macular degeneration may be distinguished: Dry (non-exudative) AMD and wet (exudative) AMD. Dry AMD, the less serious of the two, occurs in about 85% of patients diagnosed with macular degeneration and refers to the condition in which, due to advancing age, the retina accumulates waste material, which leads to amorphous deposits termed as drusen and the retinal pigment epithelial cells degenerate leading to loss of central vision.  No specific treatment is available, although, a diet implemented with carotenoid has been proved to slow the lesions progression and the visual impairment.  The wet AMD accounts for only 15% of all macular degeneration, but causes up to 90% of blindness in individuals diagnosed with AMD. Wet AMD refers to the condition, in which new blood vessels grow from the choroid (the layer between vascularized retina and sclera). This process is known as "choroidal neovascularization," and causes uplift of the macula from its normal position resulting in blurred and distorted vision. The macular damage develops rapidly and without treatment, vision loss may be rapid and severe. 
In the wet AMD, the main purpose of drug treatment is the elimination of new-formed vessels under the retina and the reduction of macular edema. An important drug treatment used for this purpose is the intravitreal injections of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Here, we report a brief review of the efficacy and safety of such drugs.
| Angiogenesis and VEGF|| |
Angiogenesis has been defined as a process of blood vessel growth and expansion by sprouting and remodeling into a highly organized vascular network.  This process normally occurs in adults during menstrual cycles and in the placenta during pregnancy. Several diseases (such as cancer, diabetes and inflammatory disorders) have been associated with angiogenic rearrangement. Among pro-angiogenic factors, VEGF regulates endothelial cell proliferation and migration.
VEGF is a dimeric glycoprotein of 36-46 kD, which acts as an angiogenic cytokine inducing mitosis.  The VEGF gene family includes six different isoforms, namely VEGF-A, VEGF-B, VEGF-C, VEGF-D, VEGF-E and placental derived growth factor.  These genes are located on chromosome 6 and share many sequences with the platelet derived growth factor gene. A host of hormones can up-regulate VEGF, such as estrogens, insulin, corticotropin, thyrotropin, steroidal hormones and a number of circulating growth factors.
Three VEGF receptor subtypes have been identified (VEGFR1-3). Induction of angiogenesis is mainly mediated by VEGFR2, which activates phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase/akt murine thymoma viral oncogene homolog (Akt) and Raf-mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase-extracellular pathways,  conversely VEGFR1 seems to play a role in adult angiogenesis by inducing endothelial cell protease.  Ligand binding activates VEGFRs, triggering a downstream intracellular signaling cascade that promotes endothelial cell proliferation, survival, activation, invasion, migration and permeability.  Both VEGFR-1 and VEGFR-2 are located in the vascular endothelium, neurosensory retina and retinal pigment epithelium cells.  The key role of VEGF in angiogenesis explains the use of anti-VEGF drugs in treatment of wet AMD.
| Materials and Methods|| |
A computer-aided search of PubMed and Cochrane library databases was performed; data were collected to review the efficacy and safety of intravitreal injections of anti-VEGF in the treatment ophthalmic diseases. The upper limit date for the search was April 30, 2013, without lower limit.
Secondary search included articles cited in reference lists identified by the primary search. Records were first screened by title/abstract before full-text articles were retrieved for eligibility evaluation. Remaining articles were then subject to a citation search before a final hand-search of all reference lists.
| Intravitreal use of Anti-VEGF Drugs|| |
VEGF is believed to be a key factor in the development and progression of choroidal neovascularization.  In recent years, anti-VEGF drugs (e.g., bevacizumab and ranibizumab) have been used in the treatment of choroidal neovascularization and several studies have demonstrated the validity of intravitreal injection of such drugs. ,
The first Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved anti-VEGF therapy for neovascular AMD was pegaptanib. Pegaptanib is an RNA aptamer that binds human VEGF 165 with high affinity and specificity.  The drug, however, did not bind other active VEGF isoforms such as VEGF121b.  Bevacizumab, the most popular agent treating choroidal neovascularization among all the anti-VEGF drugs, is a humanized monoclonal antibody with strong anti-angiogenic activity.  It is used in cancer therapy to stop the growth of the neovascular network in the context of metastatic colorectal cancer and was first approved by the US FDA in 2004.  Possible "off label" applications, refer to the treatment of neovascular macular degeneration and vascular diseases of the retina, which are characterized by a marked edematous and exudative component such as diabetic retinopathy  and occlusion of the central retinal vein. 
Another anti-VEGF drug is ranibizumab, a monoclonal antibody fragment derived from bevacizumab. It is smaller than bevacizumab and was introduced to enhance the affinity for VEGF-A.  FDA approved it for the treatment of neovascular AMD. However, bevacizumab has been extensively used off-label for this indication, mostly for economic reasons; in fact, it is much cheaper than any other anti-VEGF agent commercially available.  Recently, the results of two large-scale trials comparison of AMD treatments trials (CATT and IVAN trial), demonstrated that bevacizumab is non-inferior to ranibizumab with regards to visual improvement. ,
A recent anti-VEGF drug used for the treatment of this ophthalmic affection is aflibercept. It is a human recombinant fusion protein that binds all VEGF-A isoforms, VEGF-B and placental growth factor (PlGF).  Aflibercept has been developed for the treatment of cancer and eye disorders. The eye formulation is obtained with purification steps and modification to allow comfortable, nonirritating intravitreal injection. Aflibercept binds PlGF and animal studies have shown that PlGF contributes to the development of experimental choroidal neovascularization.  Another differentiating feature of aflibercept is represented by the binding affinity for VEGF, which is stronger than ranibizumab and bevacizumab. This allows an effective blocking of VEGF, even at low concentrations, which may translate into a longer duration of action and extended dosing intervals and also reduce the number of intravitreal injections. These encouraging results coupled with the apparent safety of the drug, fueled the demand for human clinical trials.
| Clinicial Studies and Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs)|| |
CATT  study conducted by the National Institutes of Health reported the near equivalence of ranibizumab and bevacizumab used for neovascular AMD. The CATT study concluded that ranibizumab and bevacizumab had similar effects on visual acuity over a 2-year period. The study also showed similar ADRs' profiles at 2-years, but with a slightly higher frequency for bevacizumab-related systemic adverse events.
The CATT trial showed almost similar treatment efficacy of the two drugs with a significant cost difference. The CATT study quoted the average cost of drug per patient in favor of bevacizumab.
IVAN trial  was a multi-centered, randomized trial comparing the efficacy of bevacizumab and ranibizumab in AMD. The results suggest that ranibizumab and bevacizumab are equivalent with regards to visual improvement. There was no difference between the drugs respect to serious systemic adverse effects.
View 1 and View 2  trials for aflibercept report good visual outcomes comparing aflibercept and ranibizumab. After an initial loading phase of monthly injections for 3 months, intravitreal injections of aflibercept every 2 months appeared to be non-inferior to ranibizumab.
CLEAR-IT 2 1-year data showed good visual and anatomic outcomes with aflibercept. After one injection per month for 3 months, on average one to two more injections were needed per eye on an as-required basis and average time for reinjection was reported as 129 days. 
| Anti-VEGF and ADRs|| |
Anti-VEGF, when used intravitreally, are associated with ocular adverse events. These events include endophthalmitis, intraocular inflammation, increase of intraocular pressure, vitreous hemorrhage, retinal detachment, retinal pigment epithelial tears and cataract , [Table 1].
Many studies have demonstrated that systemic levels of VEGF are lower in patients treated with bevacizumab than in those treated with ranibizumab. However, experimental observations have shown that treatment with bevacizumab may be associated with a higher risk of serious adverse effects, especially arterial thromboembolic events, due to its greater systemic penetrance.
The role of anti-VEGF in the development of systemic adverse events remains unclear. However, the risk of development of systemic adverse events may be higher with bevacizumab than with ranibizumab. In fact, ranibizumab has a higher affinity for VEGF than bevacizumab and as an antibody-binding fragment, it lacks the domain necessary to activate complement-mediated cytotoxicity or to interact with Fc receptors on immune cells.  Therefore, bevacizumab is more able to induce immunologic activation than ranibizumab. Next, the systemic concentration after intravitreal anti-VEGF injection appeared to be higher for bevacizumab (59.8-86.5 ng/mL) than for ranibizumab (0.3-2.36 ng/mL).  Thus, bevacizumab administration may represent a higher risk of systemic adverse events. The results of CATT study indicate that patients treated with bevacizumab had more frequently systemic events than ranibizumab.
Systemic administration of anti-VEGF drugs has been associated with arterial-thrombotic complications.  Arterial-thrombotic ADRs were more common among patients treated with bevacizumab, but this difference was not statistically significant. The majority of these ADRs were hospitalizations, mostly for reasons unrelated to the anti-VEGF therapy. However, despite these observation, intravitreal administration of bevacizumab, in accordance with the data accumulated in previous studies, suggest that the risk for arterial-thrombotic ADRs associated with bevacizumab therapy is low. Gastrointestinal disorders (e.g., gastrointestinal hemorrhage, nausea) were rare. 
Overall, it was concluded that there is no sufficient evidence to prove that there is a difference in rates of adverse events between these anti-VEGF drugs.
Although intravitreal anti-VEGF drugs have improved the final visual outcome of AMD, the relatively high frequency of injections required, increases the risk of endophthalmitis, rhegmatogenous retinal detachment, retinal tear, uveitis and vitreous hemorrhage [Table 1]. However, ocular complications in anti-VEGF treatment are still rather rare and are actually lower than those reported after other types of intravitreal injections.  Some studies have reported cases of pseudo-endophthalmitis with culture-negative severe intraocular inflammation that is believed to be a reaction to a non-infectious substance. 
The risk of ocular complications was also significantly higher for people undergoing anti-VEGF injection when compared with patients with neovascular AMD who did not receive anti-VEGF treatment.
| Conclusion|| |
Although the risk for the development of systemic adverse events may be higher with bevacizumab than with ranibizumab or aflibercept from a theoretical viewpoint, clinical studies demonstrate that there is no difference between the drugs in terms of the risk of systemic adverse events among patients who receive intravitreal injections. ,
Anti-VEGF therapy has changed the efficacy of treatment but not without drawbacks. Although severe ADRs were rarely observer/reported, every intravitreal injection sets patients at risk of endophthalmitis, intraocular inflammation, vitreous hemorrhage, retinal tear, retinal detachment and iatrogenic cataract. Recent studies have also suggested a sustained increase of intraocular pressure induced by repeated injections of anti-VEGF agents. 
There are three FDA-approved therapies for wet AMD:
- Aflibercept at the dose of 2 mg every 4 weeks for 3 months, followed by 2 mg every 8 weeks; 
- Ranibizumab is currently dosed at 0.5 mg monthly; 
- Bevacizumab, the most-used therapy for wet AMD because of its relatively low cost and comparable efficacy to ranibizumab, dosed at 1.25-2.5 mg/monthly. 
All three therapies are considered to have equal efficacy across the board based on studies and clinical data that have been evaluated,  but they differ from an economic point of view. In fact, a single treatment of ranibizumab costs USD 1,950. If a patient is on ranibizumab for 1 year, the cost of therapy is USD 23,400 (12 doses).  A single dose of aflibercept costs approximately USD 1,850 and the yearly cost averages USD 14,800 (8 doses). Bevacizumab is the cheapest treatment costing USD 50 per dose/treatment. A yearly treatment of one bevacizumab dose per month would cost about USD 600. 
Finally, the necessity of a smaller number of administrations of aflibercept may contribute to fewer side effects.
| Acknowledgments|| |
The Italian Drug Agency (Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco) is kindly acknowledged for its financial and technical support.
| References|| |
|1.||Pascolini D, Mariotti SP, Pokharel GP, Pararajasegaram R, Etya'ale D, Négrel AD, et al. 2002 global update of available data on visual impairment: A compilation of population-based prevalence studies. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 2004;11:67-115. |
|2.||Gehrs KM, Anderson DH, Johnson LV, Hageman GS. Age-related macular degeneration - emerging pathogenetic and therapeutic concepts. Ann Med 2006;38:450-471. |
|3.||Chopdar A, Chakravarthy U, Verma D. Age related macular degeneration. BMJ 2003;326:485-8. |
|4.||Carmeliet P, Jain RK. Angiogenesis in cancer and other diseases. Nature 2000;407:249-57. |
|5.||Leung DW, Cachianes G, Kuang WJ, Goeddel DV, Ferrara N. Vascular endothelial growth factor is a secreted angiogenic mitogen. Science 1989;246:1306-9. |
|6.||Roy H, Bhardwaj S, Ylä-Herttuala S. Biology of vascular endothelial growth factors. FEBS Lett 2006;580:2879-87. |
|7.||Ferrara N, Gerber HP, LeCouter J. The biology of VEGF and its receptors. Nat Med 2003;9:669-76. |
|8.||Shibuya M. Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1 (VEGFR-1/Flt-1): A dual regulator for angiogenesis. Angiogenesis 2006;9:225-30; discussion 231. |
|9.||Dvorak HF. Vascular permeability factor/vascular endothelial growth factor: A critical cytokine in tumor angiogenesis and a potential target for diagnosis and therapy. J Clin Oncol 2002;20:4368-80. |
|10.||Ishibashi T, Hata Y, Yoshikawa H, Nakagawa K, Sueishi K, Inomata H. Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor in experimental choroidal neovascularization. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1997;235:159-67. |
|11.||Kwak N, Okamoto N, Wood JM, Campochiaro PA. VEGF is major stimulator in model of choroidal neovascularization. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000;41:3158-64. |
|12.||Chan WM, Lai TY, Liu DT, Lam DS. Intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin) for myopic choroidal neovascularization: Six-month results of a prospective pilot study. Ophthalmology 2007;114:2190-6. |
|13.||Konstantinidis L, Mantel I, Pournaras JA, Zografos L, Ambresin A. Intravitreal ranibizumab (Lucentis) for the treatment of myopic choroidal neovascularization. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2009;247:311-8. |
|14.||Gragoudas ES, Adamis AP, Cunningham ET Jr, Feinsod M, Guyer DR. VEGF Inhibition Study in Ocular Neovascularization Clinical Trial Group. Pegaptanib for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. N Engl J Med 2004;351:2805-16. |
|15.||Ferrara N, Hillan KJ, Gerber HP, Novotny W. Discovery and development of bevacizumab, an anti-VEGF antibody for treating cancer. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2004;3:391-400 |
|16.||Avery RL, Pearlman J, Pieramici DJ, Rabena MD, Castellarin AA, Nasir MA, et al. Intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin) in the treatment of proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmology 2006;113:1695.e1-15. |
|17.||Spaide RF, Chang LK, Klancnik JM, Yannuzzi LA, Sorenson J, Slakter JS, et al. Prospective study of intravitreal ranibizumab as a treatment for decreased visual acuity secondary to central retinal vein occlusion. Am J Ophthalmol 2009;147:298-306. |
|18.||Ferrara N, Damico L, Shams N, Lowman H, Kim R. Development of ranibizumab, an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor antigen binding fragment, as therapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Retina 2006;26:859-70. |
|19.||Raftery J, Clegg A, Jones J, Tan SC, Lotery A. Ranibizumab (Lucentis) versus bevacizumab (Avastin): Modelling cost effectiveness. Br J Ophthalmol 2007;91:1244-6. |
|20.||CATT Research Group, Martin DF, Maguire MG, Ying GS, Grunwald E, Fine SL, et al. Ranibizumab and bevacizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. N Engl J Med 2011;364:1897-908. |
|21.||IVAN Study Investigators, Chakravarthy U, Harding SP, Rogers CA, Downes SM, Lotery AJ, et al. Ranibizumab versus bevacizumab to treat neovascular age-related macular degeneration: One-year findings from the IVAN randomized trial. Ophthalmology 2012;119:1399-411. |
|22.||Heier JS, Brown DM, Chong V, Korobelnik JF, Kaiser PK, Nguyen QD, et al. Intravitreal aflibercept (VEGF trap-eye) in wet age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology 2012;119:2537-48. |
|23.||Rakic JM, Lambert V, Devy L, Luttun A, Carmeliet P, Claes C, et al. Placental growth factor, a member of the VEGF family, contributes to the development of choroidal neovascularization. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003;44:3186-93. |
|24.||Heier JS, Brown DM, Chong V. VIEW 1 and VIEW 2 Study Groups. Intravitreal aflibercept (VEGF Trap-Eye) in wet age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology. 2012;119(12):2537-2548. |
|25.||Heier JS, Boyer D, Nguyen QD, Marcus D, Roth DB, Yancopoulos G, et al. The 1-year results of CLEAR-IT 2, a phase 2 study of vascular endothelial growth factor trap-eye dosed as-needed after 12-week fixed dosing. Ophthalmology 2011;118:1098-106. |
|26.||Wong LJ, Desai RU, Jain A, Feliciano D, Moshfeghi DM, Sanislo SR, et al. Surveillance for potential adverse events associated with the use of intravitreal bevacizumab for retinal and choroidal vascular disease. Retina 2008;28:1151-8. |
|27.||Georgopoulos M, Polak K, Prager F, Prünte C, Schmidt-Erfurth U. Characteristics of severe intraocular inflammation following intravitreal injection of bevacizumab (Avastin). Br J Ophthalmol 2009;93:457-62. |
|28.||Sato T, Wada K, Arahori H, Kuno N, Imoto K, Iwahashi-Shima C, et al. Serum concentrations of bevacizumab (avastin) and vascular endothelial growth factor in infants with retinopathy of prematurity. Am J Ophthalmol 2012;153:327-333.e1. |
|29.||Scappaticci FA, Skillings JR, Holden SN, Gerber HP, Miller K, Kabbinavar F, et al. Arterial thromboembolic events in patients with metastatic carcinoma treated with chemotherapy and bevacizumab. J Natl Cancer Inst 2007;99:1232-9. |
|30.||Hwang DJ, Kim YW, Woo SJ, Park KH. Comparison of systemic adverse events associated with intravitreal anti-VEGF injection: Ranibizumab versus bevacizumab. J Korean Med Sci 2012;27:1580-5. |
|31.||Jager RD, Aiello LP, Patel SC, Cunningham ET Jr. Risks of intravitreous injection: A comprehensive review. Retina 2004;24:676-98. |
|32.||Sato T, Emi K, Ikeda T, Bando H, Sato S, Morita S, et al. Severe intraocular inflammation after intravitreal injection of bevacizumab. Ophthalmology 2010;117:512-6, 516.e1. |
|33.||Tseng JJ, Vance SK, Della Torre KE, Mendonca LS, Cooney MJ, Klancnik M, et al. Sustained increased intraocular pressure related to intravitreal antivascular endothelial growth factor therapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. J Glaucoma 2012;21:241-7. |
|34.||Nguyen QD, Campochiaro PA, Shah SM, Browning DJ, Hudson HL, Sonkin PL, et al. Evaluation of very high- and very low-dose intravitreal aflibercept in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther 2012;28:581-8. |
|35.||Chen E, Brown DM, Wong TP, Benz MS, Kegley E, Cox J, et al. Lucentis using Visudyne study: Determining the threshold-dose fluence of verteporfin photodynamic therapy combined with intravitreal ranibizumab for exudative macular degeneration. Clin Ophthalmol 2010;4:1073-9. |
|36.||Costa RA, Jorge R, Calucci D, Cardillo JA, Melo LA Jr, Scott IU. Intravitreal bevacizumab for choroidal neovascularization caused by AMD (IBeNA Study): Results of a phase 1 dose-escalation study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006;47:4569-78. |
|37.||Kovach JL, Schwartz SG, Flynn HW Jr, Scott IU. Anti-VEGF Treatment Strategies for Wet AMD. J Ophthalmol 2012;2012:786-870. |
|38.||Hurley SF, Matthews JP, Guymer RH. Cost-effectiveness of ranibizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Cost Eff Resour Alloc 2008;6:12. |
|This article has been cited by|
||SRPKIN-1: A Covalent SRPK1/2 Inhibitor that Potently Converts VEGF from Pro-angiogenic to Anti-angiogenic Isoform
| ||John M. Hatcher,Guowei Wu,Chuyue Zeng,Jie Zhu,Fan Meng,Sherrina Patel,Wenqiu Wang,Scott B. Ficarro,Alan L. Leggett,Chelsea E. Powell,Jarrod A. Marto,Kang Zhang,Jacky Chi Ki Ngo,Xiang-Dong Fu,Tinghu Zhang,Nathanael S. Gray |
| ||Cell Chemical Biology. 2018; |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||HIF inhibitors for ischemic retinopathies and cancers: options beyond anti-VEGF therapies
| ||Saima Subhani,Divya Teja Vavilala,Mridul Mukherji |
| ||Angiogenesis. 2016; 19(3): 257 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||12-Deoxyphorbol 13-palmitate inhibits the expression of VEGF and HIF-1a in MCF-7 cells by blocking the PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway
| ||Ying Yang,Huan Cong,Cuicui Han,Liling Yue,Haiying Dong,Jicheng Liu |
| ||Oncology Reports. 2015; |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Successful long-term management of choroidal neovascularization secondary to angioid streaks in a patient with pseudoxanthoma elasticum: a case report
| ||Maria Savastano,Angelo Minnella,Gaetano Zinzanella,Benedetto Falsini,Aldo Caporossi |
| ||Journal of Medical Case Reports. 2014; 8(1): 458 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Effect of chromogranin A-derived vasostatin-1 on laser-induced choroidal neovascularization in the mouse
| ||Silvia Maestroni,Anna Maestroni,Simona Ceglia,Gemma Tremolada,Monica Mancino,Angelina Sacchi,Rosangela Lattanzio,Ilaria Zucchiatti,Angelo Corti,Francesco Bandello,Gianpaolo Zerbini |
| ||Acta Ophthalmologica. 2014; : n/a |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|