Table of Contents  
AUTHORíS REPLY
Year : 2015  |  Volume : 6  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 235  

Author's reply


Associate Editor, JPP, Department of Pharmacology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Pondicherry, India

Date of Web Publication15-Dec-2015

Correspondence Address:
S Manikandan
Department of Pharmacology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Pondicherry
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Manikandan S. Author's reply. J Pharmacol Pharmacother 2015;6:235

How to cite this URL:
Manikandan S. Author's reply. J Pharmacol Pharmacother [serial online] 2015 [cited 2019 Jul 18];6:235. Available from: http://www.jpharmacol.com/text.asp?2015/6/4/235/171872

Sir,

I thank the authors for welcoming the criticism on 19th Model List of Essential Medicines (EML) in their correspondence. One needs to remember that the majority of the global population dwells in developing countries and in places inaccessible to sophisticated tertiary care. The hands of the health care worker serving in the primary health centers and communities of these areas are unclean and loaded with variable amounts of organic material. The guidelines including the World Health Organization (WHO) state that in this context, handwashing with soap and water is superior to alcohol-based hand rub.[1] We also need to remember that “cost-effectiveness” is considered rather than efficacy while selecting a drug for essential medicines list. So, in the other context also, handwashing with soap and water should be preferred over alcohol-based hand rub for inclusion in the WHO EML.

The reference (no. 3) quoted by the authors of the correspondence with regards to their argument on daclatasvir is a news release issued by the United States Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) on 24 July 2015 which states that “Today's approval provides a new option ….” The drug was approved in July 2015, but the 19th EML was released on April 2015. So, WHO has included an investigational agent in their list.

The approval of bedaquiline was based on phase 2 trials.[2] Bedaquiline got approval under accelerated approval program [2] and the authors of the letter themselves write that the European Medicines Agency has given a conditional marketing authorization. So, it is very clear that it has not been completely registered.

It would be very much appreciated if the readers get the broader picture of the issues highlighted in the editorial. These issues should be considered by every country while developing the national list based on the model list.

 
   References Top

1.
Who.int. Geneva: World Health Organization. Available from: http://www.who.int/gpsc/tools/faqs/system_change/en/. [Last accessed on 2015 Sep 27].  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
fda.gov. Maryland: Food and Drug Administration. Available from: http://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm333695.htm. [Last accessed on 2015 Sep 27].  Back to cited text no. 2
    




 

Top
  
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed738    
    Printed25    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded117    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal