Table of Contents  
RESEARCH PAPER
Year : 2017  |  Volume : 8  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 3-7  

Effect of addition of fentanyl and clonidine to local anesthetic solution in peribulbar block


Department of Anesthesiology, P. D. U. Medical College, Rajkot, Gujarat, India

Date of Submission28-Jul-2016
Date of Decision08-Sep-2016
Date of Acceptance26-Oct-2016
Date of Web Publication17-Mar-2017

Correspondence Address:
Poonam Nehra
B-424, New PG Hostel, Jamnagar Road, Rajkot - 360 001, Gujarat
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jpp.JPP_109_16

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 

Objective: To compare the effect of addition of fentanyl and clonidine as adjuvants to bupivacaine and lignocaine in peribulbar block. Methods: The study was conducted on 105 adult patients of either sex, of ASA grade I and II undergoing ophthalmic surgeries. Patients were randomly divided into 3 groups of 35 each. All the patients were given peribulbuar block with 5ml lignocaine 2% +3 ml bupivacaine 0.5% +1 ml hyaluronidase (250 IU). In addition to this 1 ml normal saline was added to Group S, 25 μg fentanyl to Group F and 25 μg clonidine to Group C. Onset and duration of globe and lid akinesia, duration of sensory blockage and analgesia, hemodynamic parameters, number of rescue analgesic and visual analogue score were recorded. Results: The mean time of onset of globe and lid akinesia was significantly faster in group F and group C compared to group S, mean duration of globe and lid akinesia was longer in Group F (207.71 + 13.54 and 143.14 + 7.86 min) and group C (213.52 + 14.52 and 162.06 + 17.1 min) compared to group S (117.78 + 10.42 and 87.64 + 9.76 min). The mean duration of analgesia was significantly longer in group F (217.71 + 12.67) and C (258.82 + 14.50 min) as compared to group S (131.39 + 9.63 min). Conclusion: Addition of fentanyl or clonidine as adjuvant to local anaesthetic in peribulbar block provides faster onset and prolonged analgesia compared to local anaesthetic alone.

Keywords: Clonidine, fentanyl, peribulbar block, postoperative analgesia


How to cite this article:
Nehra P, Oza V, Parmar V, Fumakiya P. Effect of addition of fentanyl and clonidine to local anesthetic solution in peribulbar block. J Pharmacol Pharmacother 2017;8:3-7

How to cite this URL:
Nehra P, Oza V, Parmar V, Fumakiya P. Effect of addition of fentanyl and clonidine to local anesthetic solution in peribulbar block. J Pharmacol Pharmacother [serial online] 2017 [cited 2017 May 27];8:3-7. Available from: http://www.jpharmacol.com/text.asp?2017/8/1/3/202389


   Introduction Top


Regional anesthetic techniques with adjuvants are commonly used to improve block characteristics and extend analgesic effect into the postoperative period. For majority of ophthalmic procedures regional anesthesia in the form of peribulbar and retrobulbar block has gained popularity over general anesthesia.[1],[2] The majority of patients are often elderly with comorbid conditions. There is less hemodynamic instability, less respiratory depression, better postoperative analgesia, and less nausea and vomiting with regional anesthesia and hence safer and more effective than general anesthesia.

Retrobulbar block provides adequate rapid anesthesia, akinesia and control of intraocular pressure as well as postoperative analgesia.[3],[4],[5] But sometimes, it may cause serious complications such as globe perforation, brainstem anesthesia, and retrobulbar hemorrhage. Peribulbar block is a rapid, simple and safe technique but requires larger volume of local anesthetic solution to produce the desired akinesia. The duration of the block depends on the type and composition of the local anesthetic mixture injected. Short duration of these blocks was found to be the main problem intraoperatively. Hence, the present study was carried out to determine effect of adding adjuvants to local anesthetic solution in peribulbar blocks for superior analgesia. The addition of adjuvant drugs such as opioids, clonidine, ketamine, and prostigmine to the local anesthetic mixture might prolong the duration of the block. These drugs have been used along with local anesthetics for extradural, intrathecal and peripheral nerve plexuses blocks to produce more intense and prolonged analgesia.[6],[7],[8],[9],[10],[11] Opioids are commonly added to local anesthetic solutions to increase intensity and duration of anesthesia by acting on opioid receptors present on the central nervous system.[12],[13] However, fentanyl has side effects like vomiting and respiratory depression.[10] Clonidine, an alpha 2-agonist, is found to prolong anesthesia and analgesia of local anesthetics and duration of retrobulbar block.[14] Bradycardia and hypotension are common side effects of clonidine.[15] Hyaluronidase as an adjuvant to anesthetic mixture helps in spreading injected mixtures thus accelerating the onset time and improving the quality of block.[16] The combination of fentanyl and clonidine added to local anesthetics has an advantage of decreasing the side effects of both the drugs due to smaller dose used.


   Materials and Methods Top


After approval from Institutional Ethics Committee P. D. U. Medical College, Rajkot, a controlled prospective clinical study was carried out in the year 2014–2015 on 105 patients of age >15 years, of either sex including adult and geriatric age group undergoing ophthalmic surgeries under peribulbar block of the American Society of Anaesthesiology Grade I and II and informed written consent was obtained from all the patients. Exclusion criteria included-coagulation abnormalities, known allergic reaction to drug, local infection at the puncture site, patients with impaired orbital and periorbital sensation, patients with complicated vitreous hemorrhage as retinal detachment, extensive epiretinal membrane, dropped nucleus or intraocular lens, patients with posterior staphyloma, patients with axial length more than 28 mm or patient's refusal.

All the patients were made familiar with standard 10 cm visual analog scale (VAS) preoperatively.

For elimination of bias in the study blinding of investigators, participants, and assessors of both the study groups was done. Randomisation was done by computer-generated sequence numbers.

Three groups were made:

  1. Control group S: 5 ml lignocaine 2% +3 ml bupivacaine 0.5% +1 ml hyaluronidase (250 IU) +1 ml normal saline
  2. Fentanyl group F: 5 ml lignocaine 2% +3 ml bupivacaine 0.5% +1 ml hyaluronidase (250 IU) +1 ml fentanyl (25 µg diluted to normal saline 1 ml)
  3. Clonidine group C: 5 ml lignocaine 2% +3 ml bupivacaine + 1 ml hyaluronidase (250 IU) +1 ml clonidine (25 µg diluted to normal saline 1 ml).


All patients underwent a preanesthetic check-up before surgery, and all the routine and specific investigations were documented. The patients were electively made nil per oral for 6 h before surgery. Standard monitors such as electrocardiogram, noninvasive blood pressure, and pulse oximeter were applied, and patients vitals were recorded, intravenous (IV) line was secured and patients were premedicated with injection glycopyrolate (0.2 mg IV, injection ondansetron (4 mg) IV and injection ranitidine (50 mg) IV.

Technique of peribulbar block

In peribulbar block, short beveled fine 25 G needle was inserted in inferotemporal part of lower orbital rim at the junction of medial 2/3 and lateral 1/3 at infraorbital notch. It was proceeded 1–2 mm vertically and tilted 15° superiorly, injecting local anesthetic mixture around the globe, total 10 ml of solution was injected, around 6–8 ml in peribulbar region and 2 ml in lower eyelid. Compression was given over the globe for 10 min with pinky ball (ball was released after first 5 min and then was compressed again to prevent central retinal artery occlusion).

Assessment of effect of block

Evaluation of the success of the block was done by scoring the mobility of eyeball at 1, 3, 5, 10, and 15 min after the end of injection. Movements were scored by three-point scoring system in the four quadrants as:

  • 0 = akinesia (ocular movement <1 mm)
  • 1 = reduced movement (ocular movement >1 mm but <4 mm)
  • 2 = normal movement (ocular movement >4 mm).


Giving a maximum aggregate score of 8 for the four muscles, a score of 0 in all four directions was taken to indicate a successful block. If not achieved within 15 min after injection, the case was excluded from the study.

The onset of globe akinesia was recorded from the time of injection of local anesthetic until complete globe akinesia (Score 0).

Lid akinesia was assessed by asking the patient to open both the eyes widely followed by squeezing them maximally. Onset of lid akinesia was defined as time elapsing from injection of local anesthetic solution until complete lid paralysis.

Duration of globe akinesia was recorded from time of injection of local anesthetic mixture till recurrence of muscle movements (Score 8).

The duration of the lid akinesia was recorded from the time of injection of local anesthetic mixture till full recurrence of lid movements.

Globe anesthesia was assessed by a gentle touch on the conjunctiva with a cotton swab. Duration of globe anesthesia was recorded from the time of injection of local anesthetic till the complete disappearance of sensation.

The level of sedation was measured using Ramsay sedation score.

Ramsay sedation scale

  1. Agitated, anxious or restless
  2. Co-operative, oriented and tranquil
  3. Responsive to commands only
  4. Brisk response to light glabellar tap or loud auditory stimulus
  5. Sluggish response to light glabellar tap or loud auditory stimulus
  6. No response to light glabellar tap or loud auditory stimulus.


Postoperative assessment

  1. Duration of lid and globe akinesia
  2. Time of rescue analgesic given when VAS ≥4 and total number of rescue analgesic given.


Postoperatively, patients were monitored for pulse, blood pressure, SpO2, sedation and complications (if any).

Assessment of pain

Patients were examined for the duration of analgesia as per VAS.

VAS is a 10 cm line which is marked as shown below.

The patients were asked to make a vertical mark on the line to indicate the intensity of their pain and VAS was scored by measuring from the left side, how far the patient marked towards the maximum pain end. This number was then used to compare changes in pain level. VAS was recorded hourly. When VAS of ≥4 postoperatively, rescue analgesia was given in the form of injection diclofenac sodium 1.5 mg/kg i.m. and time of rescue analgesia was noted.

All the patients were observed for incidence of any side effects and complications such as nausea, vomiting, hypotension, bradycardia, globe perforation, oculocardiac reflex, and chemosis during intra- and post-operative period.

Statistical analysis was done using Microsoft Excel 2010. Intergroup comparison of ordinal data was done by one-way analysis of variance. Categorical data were compared together using Chi-square test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.


   Results Top


[Table 1] shows demographic characteristics of the three groups. There was no statistically significant difference among three groups in terms of age, weight, sex, and duration of surgery.
Table 1: Demographic characteristics (mean±standard deviation)

Click here to view


[Table 2] shows the characteristics of the block. The mean time of onset of globe akinesia was significantly faster in group F (6.94 ± 3.55 min) and C (6.70 ± 3.3 min) as compared to group S (10.91 ± 3.74 min). Similarly, the mean time of onset of lid akinesia was significantly faster in group F (4.08 ± 1.73 min) and C (4.03 ± 1.72 min) as compared to group S (6.97 ± 3.61 min).
Table 2: Characteristics of the block

Click here to view


Mean duration of globe akinesia was 117.78 ± 10.42 min in group S, 207.71 ± 13.54 min in group F and 213.52 ± 14.52 min in group C signifying longer duration of globe akinesia in group F and C as compared to group S. Furthermore, the mean duration of lid akinesia was significantly longer in group F (143.14 ± 7.86 min) and C (162.06 ± 17.1 min) as compared to group S (87.64 ± 9.76 min).

Group F (217.7143 ± 12.67 min) and group C (258.82 ± 14.50 min) had a longer duration of analgesia in comparison to group S (258.82 ± 14.50 min). The mean duration of sensory blockage was longer in group F (79.71 ± 7.64 min) and C (80.88 ± 7.81 min) compared to group S (67.63 ± 7.925 min).

[Figure 1] and [Figure 2] show hemodynamic changes during the surgery. [Figure 1] shows the mean blood pressure changes during the surgery. In group S, mean blood pressure ranges from 90.9 ± 6.12 to 88.6 ± 15.5, in group F from 90.1 ± 4.92 to 88.3 ± 3.49, and in group C, it ranges from 92.2 ± 2.48 to 90.2 ± 4.34. There is no statistically significant difference in mean blood pressure of the patients between the three groups (P ≥ 0.05).
Figure 1: Pulse rate changes

Click here to view
Figure 2: Mean arterial pressure changes

Click here to view


[Figure 2] shows the mean pulse rate changes during surgery. In group S, mean pulse rate ranges from 75.22 ± 8.94 to 76.82 ± 6.52, in group B from 78.62 ± 6.25 to 80.34 ± 6.34 and group C from 78.85 ± 3.37 to 81.33 ± 1.10. The result shows that there is no statistically significant difference in pulse rate of the patients between the three groups.

[Figure 3] shows the first analgesic requirement after performing the block. Of 35 patients in group S, 11 patients required first analgesic dose in 2nd h and 24 patients required it in 3rd h. In group F 34 patients required the first analgesic in 4th h and only one required it in 3rd h. In group C, 33 patients required the first analgesic in 4th h and 2 required it in 5th h. These results show there is a longer duration of analgesia in group F and C as compared to group S.
Figure 3: First analgesic requirement

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


Injection of local anesthetic mixtures in neural blocks may sometimes lead to unsatisfactory surgical conditions for relatively lengthy operations. The addition of adjuvant to local anesthetics aims to prolong their duration of action. Opioids produce antinociceptive action by acting on central and peripheral opioid receptors.[17]

Local anesthetics act through blockage of selective sodium channels, on the other hand, opioids, act on opioid receptors and cause an increase in potassium conductance. Hence, the combination of local anesthetic and opioid provides superior anesthesia by inhibiting multiple areas of neuronal excitability. Fentanyl, a synthetic opioid has been shown to have local anesthetic action.[18],[19],[20] Clonidine is an alpha agonist with both analgesic and sedative properties. Its mechanism of action involves direct action on peripheral alpha 2 receptors and blockage of conduction of type C fibers.[20],[21]

Our study compares the effect of the addition of fentanyl and clonidine to local anesthetic solution in peribulbar block. Results obtained in our study are comparable to study carried out by Maha MI oussef et al.[22]. They studied the effect of fentanyl versus that of clonidine when used as adjuvants to bupivacaine in peribulbar block and showed that the addition of either clonidine or fentanyl to the local anesthetic during peribulbar block results in a rapid onset and longer duration of the block with a longer period of postoperative analgesia (group F 262 min ± 9.71), group C 298 ± 11.16 min). The addition of clonidine was found to prolong the duration of the block more than that of fentanyl. Fahmy NG et al[23]. studied the effect of adding fentanyl and/or clonidine to local anesthetic on prolongation of the peribulbar block in cataract surgery and concluded that the addition of clonidine alone to local anesthetic solution in peribulbar block prolonged the duration of block for up to 2 h only. The addition of fentanyl alone to local anesthetic solution could not prolong the duration of the block, while the addition of both clonidine and fentanyl to local anesthetic solution prolonged the duration of the block for up to 3 h.

Prolongation of analgesia by clonidine is also supported by the study carried out by Bharti et al.[24] in which he added 1 µg/kg clonidine to local anesthetic mixture and found a significant increase in the duration of anesthesia and analgesia after peribulbar block.

Gupta and Gurunath [25] also showed that adding clonidine to local anesthetic mixture prolongs the duration of sensory blockage.

Our results are also consistent with the study done by Abo El Enin et al.[26] in which they studied the effect of fentanyl addition to local anesthetic in peribulbar block and observed that addition of fentanyl to local anesthetic mixtures fastens the onset and prolongs the duration of akinesia and postoperative analgesia in peribulbar block.

The study done by Connelly et al.[27] on the contrary reported no difference in the onset of akinesia after addition of clonidine. V. Toprek et al.[28] have also reported that addition of clonidine to 1% ropivacaine has no clinically significant benefit.

Apart from nausea and vomiting, chemosis was also reported in our study. A study by Bharti et al.[24] also showed no significant hemodynamic or respiratory side effects between the studied groups.

Further researches may be carried out for different doses of the adjuvants like clonidine and fentanyl to confirm the results of our study. Bharti et al.[24] compared the three doses of clonidine in peribulbar block and concluded that addition of 1 µg/kg clonidine with anesthetic mixture significantly prolonged duration of analgesia and anesthesia after peribulbar blocks with limited side effects.


   Conclusion Top


Peribulbar block is a safe and effective technique for ophthalmic procedures. The addition of fentanyl or clonidine as an adjuvant to local anesthetic solution in peribulbar block provides faster onset and prolonged duration of globe and lid akinesia and postoperative analgesia with stable intraoperative hemodynamics.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
   References Top

1.
Hamilton RC, Gimbel HV, Strunin L. Regional anaesthesia for 12,000 cataract extraction and intraocular lens implantation procedures. Can J Anaesth 1988;35:615-23.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Ripart J, Lefrant JY, de La Coussaye JE, Prat-Pradal D, Vivien B, Eledjam JJ. Peribulbar versus retrobulbar anesthesia for ophthalmic surgery: An anatomical comparison of extraconal and intraconal injections. Anesthesiology 2001;94:56-62.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Alhassan MB, Kyari F, Ejere HO. Peribulbar versus retrobulbar anaesthesia for cataract surgery. Anesth Analg 2008;107:2089.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Gunja N, Varshney K. Brainstem anaesthesia after retrobulbar block: A rare cause of coma presenting to the emergency department. Emerg Med Australas 2006;18:83-5.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Ashaye AO, Ubah JN, Sotumbi PT. Respiratory arrest after retrobulbar anaesthesia. West Afr J Med 2002;21:343-4.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Gaitini LA, Somri M, Vaida SJ, Yanovski B, Mogilner G, Sabo E, et al. Does the addition of fentanyl to bupivacaine in caudal epidural block have an effect on the plasma level of catecholamines in children? Anesth Analg 2000;90:1029-33.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
De Mey JC, Strobbet J, Poelaert J, Hoebeke P, Mortier E. The influence of sufentanil and/or clonidine on the duration of analgesia after a caudal block for hypospadias repair surgery in children. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2000;17:379-82.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Constant I, Gall O, Gouyet L, Chauvin M, Murat I. Addition of clonidine or fentanyl to local anaesthetics prolongs the duration of surgical analgesia after single shot caudal block in children. Br J Anaesth 1998;80:294-8.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Baris S, Karakaya D, Kelsaka E, Güldogus F, Ariturk E, Tür A. Comparison of fentanyl-bupivacaine or midazolam-bupivacaine mixtures with plain bupivacaine for caudal anaesthesia in children. Paediatr Anaesth 2003;13:126-31.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Vercauteren M, Meert TF. Isobolographic analysis of the interaction between epidural sufentanil and bupivacaine in rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 1997;58:237-42.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Palmer CM, Van Maren G, Nogami WM, Alves D. Bupivacaine augments intrathecal fentanyl for labor analgesia. Anesthesiology 1999;91:84-9.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Madan R, Bharti N, Shende D, Khokhar SK, Kaul HL. A dose response study of clonidine with local anesthetic mixture for peribulbar block: A comparison of three doses. Anesth Analg 2001;93:1593-7.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Butterworth JF 5th, Strichartz GR. The alpha 2-adrenergic agonists clonidine and guanfacine produce tonic and phasic block of conduction in rat sciatic nerve fibers. Anesth Analg 1993;76:295-301.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Calenda E, Quintyn JC, Brasseur G. Peribulbar anaesthesia using a combination of lidocaine, bupivocaine and clonidine in vitreoretinal surgery. Indian J Ophthalmol 2002;50:205-8.  Back to cited text no. 14
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
15.
Friedman DS, Reeves SW, Bass EB, Lubomski LH, Fleisher LA, Schein OD. Patient preferences for anaesthesia management during cataract surgery. Br J Ophthalmol 2004;88:333-5.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Rüschen H, Celaschi D, Bunce C, Carr C. Randomised controlled trial of sub-Tenon's block versus topical anaesthesia for cataract surgery: A comparison of patient satisfaction. Br J Ophthalmol 2005;89:291-3.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Stein C. Peripheral mechanisms of opioid analgesia. Anesth Analg 1993;76:182-91.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Laduron PM. Axonal transport of opiate receptors in capsaicin-sensitive neurones. Brain Res 1984;294:157-60.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Nishikawa K, Kanaya N, Nakayama M, Igarashi M, Tsunoda K, Namiki A. Fentanyl improves analgesia but prolongs the onset of axillary brachial plexus block by peripheral mechanism. Anesth Analg 2000;91:384-7.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Gaumann DM, Brunet PC, Jirounek P. Clonidine enhances the effects of lidocaine on C-fiber action potential. Anesth Analg 1992;74:719-25.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Khasar SG, Green PG, Chou B, Levine JD. Peripheral nociceptive effects of alpha 2-adrenergic receptor agonists in the rat. Neuroscience 1995;66:427-32.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Maha MI Youssef, Karim Girgis, Sherif Mohamad Soaida. The effect of fentanyl versus that of clonidine when used as adjuvants to bupivacaine in peribulbar block. Egypt J Anaesth 2014;30:267-72.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Fahmy NG, Fahmy AM, Kamal KY. Clonidine versus fentanyl as adjuvants to bupivacaine in peribulbar anesthesia. Ain Sham J Anaesthesiol 2011;4:41-7.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Bharti N, Madan R, Kaul HL, Khokhar SK, Mishra S. Effect of addition of clonidine to local anaesthetic mixture for peribulbar block. Anaesth Intensive Care 2002;30:438-41.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Gupta RP, Gurunath VS. Studied Effect of Adding Clonidine to Anaesthetic Mixture on Efficacy and Duration of Peribulbar Block. He Concluded that Adding Clonidine to Local Anaesthetic Mixture Prolongs the Duration of Sensory Blockage. In AIOC 2010 Proceeding Cataract Session. Vol. IV. 2010. p. 133-4.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Abo El Enin MA, Amin IE, Abd El Aziz AS, Mahdy MM, Abo El Enin MA, Mostafa MM. Effect of fentanyl addition to local anaesthetic in peribulbar block. Indian J Anaesth 2009;53:57-63.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Connelly NR, Camerlenghi G, Bilodeau M, Hall S, Reuben SS, Papale J. Use of clonidine as a component of the peribulbar block in patients undergoing cataract surgery. Reg Anesth Pain Med 1999;24:426-9.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Toprak V, Topcu I, Toprak B, Kaygsz Z, Baser E, Güler E. A comparison of 1% ropivacaine and 1% ropivacaine with clonidine for retrobulbar block. Internet J Anaesthesiol 2005;11:1-8. Available from: https://www.ispub.com/IJA/11/1/11625.  Back to cited text no. 28
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2]



 

Top
  
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Introduction
    Materials and Me...
   Results
   Discussion
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed526    
    Printed6    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded186    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal