Close
  Indian J Med Microbiol
 

Figure 1a: Effect on escape latency (s) of rats in the water maze paradigm. Data are mean ± SEM of eight animals in each group. a: P < 0.001 (significant difference compared to control I). c: P < 0.05 (significant difference compared to Al treatment II) Figure 1b:Effect on total time spent (s) by rats in the probe quadrant in the water maze paradigm. Data are mean ± SEM of eight animals in each group. a: P < 0.001 (significant difference compared to control I). c: P < 0.05 (significant difference compared to Al treatment II)

Figure 1a: Effect on escape latency (s) of rats in the water maze paradigm. Data are mean ± SEM of eight animals in each group. a: <i>P</i> < 0.001 (significant difference compared to control I). c: <i>P</i> < 0.05 (significant difference compared to Al treatment II)
Figure 1b:Effect on total time spent (s) by rats in the probe quadrant in the water maze paradigm. Data are mean ± SEM of eight animals in each group. a: <i>P</i> < 0.001 (significant difference compared to control I). c: <i>P</i> < 0.05 (significant difference compared to Al treatment II)