Close
  Indian J Med Microbiol
 

Figure 8: Effects of asenapine on cytosolic Ca2+ in H9C2 in peroxidative conditions. (a) Dose-response and time-course study. The results are the mean ± standard deviation of five experiments. (b) An example taken from one experiment. (c) Effects of asenapine on Ca2+ in the presence or absence of various blockers. C = Basal; A = Asenapine; Nefaz = Nefazodone (1 μM); propionyl = Propionyl promazine (1 μM); NAD = NAD-299 (1 μM); amlodip = Amlodipine (1 μM); ML218 = ML218 (1 μM); L-NAME = Nω-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (10 mM). The results are the mean ± standard deviation of five experiments for each experimental protocol. (c) b, d, e P < 0.05 versus a; c, d, e, f, g, h P < 0.05 versus b. One-way ANOVA followed by Newman–Keuls post hoc test

Figure 8: Effects of asenapine on cytosolic Ca<sup>2+</sup> in H9C2 in peroxidative conditions. (a) Dose-response and time-course study. The results are the mean ± standard deviation of five experiments. (b) An example taken from one experiment. (c) Effects of asenapine on Ca<sup>2+</sup> in the presence or absence of various blockers. C = Basal; A = Asenapine; Nefaz = Nefazodone (1 μM); propionyl = Propionyl promazine (1 μM); NAD = NAD-299 (1 μM); amlodip = Amlodipine (1 μM); ML218 = ML218 (1 μM); L-NAME = Nω-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (10 mM). The results are the mean ± standard deviation of five experiments for each experimental protocol. (c) b, d, e<i> P </i>< 0.05 versus a; c, d, e, f, g, h<i> P </i>< 0.05 versus b. One-way ANOVA followed by Newman–Keuls <i>post hoc</i> test